Everyone uses the internet whether it’s for work,
education or recreation. We sign up to many different sites that all have their
own terms and conditions outlining their uses policy and many other things.
Normally this wouldn’t be a problem; after all would people really sign a
lengthy legal document without reading it first and finding out what they were
committing to? The answer would almost always be no, no one would take the
chance that they were signing away something important like their privacy. However
when it comes to the internet there seems to be a different protocol that is
generally followed. The problem is that most people are so impatient to get to
where they are going, ‘the end point’ of the website so that they can start
using these websites, such as Facebook, that they never really pay attention.
The majority of people never stop to actually read the terms and conditions
instead they just hit the accept square and continue with the registration
process. The problem being that they have essentially said 'Yes' to something
without knowing what they have automatically agreed to: added to this is the
ridiculously 'long' legal contract it is unreasonable to expect everyone might
read or understand!
Throughout our continued use of the internet we are
being inspected, through mediums such as cookies, worms and perhaps the biggest
one Google earth/street view. Most people value their privacy but very few
realise how little privacy they have once they open a web browser. For example
with Google street view, you can get such a good view of someone’s house that
you can count the cracks on the exterior walls. Social media sites constantly
track user’s likes and dislikes and even go so far as to tailor make what
advertisements are seen by each user, possibly creating a very narrow-minded
view of the world for that individual if they are constantly bombarded with
similar stuff, where then is the possibility of growth or new learning’s and
appreciation?
The major surveillance though is unavoidable. Users
do retain the power to say 'no', but then they are unable to access the
websites that they wish to, so they always say 'yes' to avoid lock out. Users
will give up their privacy, so the uninhibited access to the internet won’t be
compromised. People would never want their privacy compromised in an off web
situation, so why then are they always so quick to tick accept when it comes to
internet sites' terms and conditions and consequently have their online privacy
compromised?
Everything you’ve said here is very true. People are only too eager to sign away their privacy (sometimes even credit card details) if it means that they get access to social platforms. While this is all very true I don’t think that we can limit this disregard to just social media websites and apps. When it comes to installing computer software people take the very same approach and skip past reading the terms and conditions so that they can hurry up and get to use the product. I once read that if you actually stopped to read the terms and conditions that accompany the setup of iTunes, it would take you around 8 days to read every last bit of it. This post has been pretty eye-opening and very interesting. Well done, I really enjoyed reading it.
ReplyDeleteGreat question: 'Do I still have privacy?'
ReplyDeleteYou have a keen eye for the issues one might easily overlook in the course of one's daily life, and I thank you for raising them. I agree with you yet were I to play the Devil's advocate I could question the validity of your opinion because you forgot to mention where you got these information from. For example, you start by saying that 'everyone uses the internet'. I could respectfully counter by asking whether you're talking of everyone you know or if there is actually a study somewhere that has managed to prove that every single human being on the planet had access to the internet. Please understand that this kind of rhetoric based on unsubstantiated and easily refutable generalisations seriously weakens and undermines what could have otherwise been a brilliant post. Please include the missing references so that your argumentation would be based on facts instead of opinions and avoid the use of 'absolutes', then your post would gain credence and be appealing not only to those who already with you, but it may serve to convince those who so far still disagree.
This being said, allow me to reiterate that I did enjoy reading this post. Also, you have managed to build your argumentation around the question of privacy in an engaging way to conclude brilliantly with an open question that paves the way for a nice discussion and further research on the subject. Well done!